{"id":2056,"date":"2013-05-24T14:10:38","date_gmt":"2013-05-24T13:10:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2056"},"modified":"2016-05-10T14:11:19","modified_gmt":"2016-05-10T13:11:19","slug":"sentence-1203","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2013\/05\/24\/sentence-1203\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1203"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1203 \u2013 2nd degr\u00e9 &#8211; Collision all\u00e9gu\u00e9e d\u2019un long c\u00e2ble en remorque d\u2019un navire de recherche sismique par un porte-conteneurs &#8211; Saisine de la CAMP en vertu d\u2019une lettre de garantie &#8211; Implication du porte-conteneurs (oui) &#8211; Responsabilit\u00e9 (non d\u00e9montr\u00e9e). <\/strong>Le principe qui domine la responsabilit\u00e9 en mati\u00e8re d\u2019abordage oblige le demandeur \u00e0 prouver\u00a0: 1\u00b0 la cause de l\u2019accident \u2013 2\u00b0 que la faute est imputable au navire recherch\u00e9. Bien que contest\u00e9e par le capitaine et son armateur, le Tribunal arbitral a estim\u00e9 qu\u2019un faisceau d\u2019indices concordants permettait d\u2019\u00e9tablir l\u2019implication du porte-conteneurs. Il n\u2019a pu toutefois retenir sa responsabilit\u00e9 car il n\u2019\u00e9tait pas prouv\u00e9 qu\u2019il aurait d\u00fb avoir une connaissance pr\u00e9alable de la pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un c\u00e2ble remorqu\u00e9 de 6 300 m\u00e8tres de longueur ou qu\u2019une veille attentive lui aurait permis d\u2019identifier sans conteste l\u2019op\u00e9ration effectu\u00e9e par le navire de recherche.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1203 \u2013 2nd degr\u00e9 &#8211; Collision all\u00e9gu\u00e9e d\u2019un long c\u00e2ble en remorque d\u2019un navire de recherche sismique par un porte-conteneurs &#8211; Saisine de la CAMP en vertu d\u2019une lettre de garantie &#8211; Implication du porte-conteneurs (oui) &#8211; Responsabilit\u00e9 (non d\u00e9montr\u00e9e). Le principe qui domine la responsabilit\u00e9 en mati\u00e8re d\u2019abordage oblige le demandeur \u00e0 prouver\u00a0:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2056","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2056"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2056\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2057,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2056\/revisions\/2057"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2056"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2056"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}