{"id":2071,"date":"2012-08-09T14:30:31","date_gmt":"2012-08-09T13:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2071"},"modified":"2016-05-10T14:31:16","modified_gmt":"2016-05-10T13:31:16","slug":"sentence-1198","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2012\/08\/09\/sentence-1198\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1198"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1198 \u2013 C\/P Baltimore Form C &#8211; Chargement de bl\u00e9 \u00e0 B\u00e2ton Rouge &#8211; Conditions FIO -Op\u00e9ration de d\u00e9ballastage anormalement longue \u2013 Application des conditions du terminal. <\/strong>En fixant son navire pour charger du grain au Mississippi o\u00f9 il est d\u2019usage que tous les terminaux imposent des tarifs et des conditions de chargement, l\u2019armateur ne pouvait pr\u00e9tendre ignorer les conditions d\u2019utilisation du quai et doit donc supporter, en raison de la lenteur du d\u00e9ballastage, les frais de retard factur\u00e9s par le terminal. Cependant, les frais de mouvement du navire &#8211; ayant d\u00fb quitter le quai apr\u00e8s que le manutentionnaire eut coup\u00e9 les amarres pour l\u2019obliger \u00e0 partir, avant de pouvoir y revenir pour compl\u00e9ter le chargement \u2013 qui s\u2019apparentent \u00e0 l\u2019utilisation d\u2019un deuxi\u00e8me quai non pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 la charte-partie, sont mis \u00e0 la charge de l\u2019affr\u00e9teur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1198 \u2013 C\/P Baltimore Form C &#8211; Chargement de bl\u00e9 \u00e0 B\u00e2ton Rouge &#8211; Conditions FIO -Op\u00e9ration de d\u00e9ballastage anormalement longue \u2013 Application des conditions du terminal. En fixant son navire pour charger du grain au Mississippi o\u00f9 il est d\u2019usage que tous les terminaux imposent des tarifs et des conditions de chargement, l\u2019armateur<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2071"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2071\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2072,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2071\/revisions\/2072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}