{"id":2080,"date":"2012-07-02T14:39:39","date_gmt":"2012-07-02T13:39:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2080"},"modified":"2016-05-10T14:40:39","modified_gmt":"2016-05-10T13:40:39","slug":"sentence-1195","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2012\/07\/02\/sentence-1195\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1195"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1195\u00a0\u2013 Affr\u00e8tement au voyage \u2013 D\u00e9chargement en C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u2013 R\u00e9glementation europ\u00e9enne interdisant toute relation financi\u00e8re avec les autorit\u00e9s de la C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u2013 Impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019ex\u00e9cution \u2013 D\u00e9dommagement de l\u2019armateur (oui) \u2013 D\u00e9penses engag\u00e9es en pure perte (oui) \u2013 Gain manqu\u00e9 (non). <\/strong>La charte-partie au voyage \u00e0 destination d\u2019Abidjan, conclue en violation d\u2019un r\u00e8glement europ\u00e9en prohibant \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9poque tout paiement entre les mains des autorit\u00e9s locales, est frapp\u00e9e d\u2019une impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019ex\u00e9cution justifiant la d\u00e9cision d\u2019annulation prise par l\u2019affr\u00e9teur. Cependant, dans la mesure o\u00f9 sa d\u00e9cision n\u2019est pas exempte de faute, l\u2019affr\u00e9teur doit indemniser le fr\u00e9teur des d\u00e9penses qu\u2019il a pu engager en pure perte mais non pas pour son gain manqu\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1195\u00a0\u2013 Affr\u00e8tement au voyage \u2013 D\u00e9chargement en C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u2013 R\u00e9glementation europ\u00e9enne interdisant toute relation financi\u00e8re avec les autorit\u00e9s de la C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u2013 Impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019ex\u00e9cution \u2013 D\u00e9dommagement de l\u2019armateur (oui) \u2013 D\u00e9penses engag\u00e9es en pure perte (oui) \u2013 Gain manqu\u00e9 (non). La charte-partie au voyage \u00e0 destination d\u2019Abidjan, conclue en violation d\u2019un r\u00e8glement<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2080","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2080","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2080"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2080\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2081,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2080\/revisions\/2081"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2080"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2080"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2080"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}