{"id":2092,"date":"2012-01-24T14:50:32","date_gmt":"2012-01-24T13:50:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2092"},"modified":"2016-05-10T14:51:38","modified_gmt":"2016-05-10T13:51:38","slug":"sentence-1191","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2012\/01\/24\/sentence-1191\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1191"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1191\u00a0\u2013 Riz en sacs sous connaissement \u00e0 ordre &#8211; Assureur subrog\u00e9 &#8211; Loss payee clause &#8211; Recevabilit\u00e9 (oui) &#8211; Valorisation du pr\u00e9judice. <\/strong>Malgr\u00e9 quelques erreurs mat\u00e9rielles dans les pi\u00e8ces produites par le demandeur, il ressort des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de fait que le vendeur a encaiss\u00e9 l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 pour le compte de son acheteur \u00e0 qui il l\u2019a revers\u00e9e. L\u2019assureur b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiant de l\u2019acte de subrogation d\u00e9livr\u00e9 par le destinataire a donc bien int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir. La responsabilit\u00e9 du transporteur n\u2019\u00e9tant pas contest\u00e9e, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de mercuriales les arbitres ont valoris\u00e9 le pr\u00e9judice sur la base de la facturation CAF augment\u00e9e de 5 %.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1191\u00a0\u2013 Riz en sacs sous connaissement \u00e0 ordre &#8211; Assureur subrog\u00e9 &#8211; Loss payee clause &#8211; Recevabilit\u00e9 (oui) &#8211; Valorisation du pr\u00e9judice. Malgr\u00e9 quelques erreurs mat\u00e9rielles dans les pi\u00e8ces produites par le demandeur, il ressort des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de fait que le vendeur a encaiss\u00e9 l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 pour le compte de son acheteur \u00e0 qui il<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2092"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2092\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2093,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2092\/revisions\/2093"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}