{"id":2123,"date":"2011-07-04T14:07:15","date_gmt":"2011-07-04T13:07:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2123"},"modified":"2016-05-25T13:19:19","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T12:19:19","slug":"sentence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2011\/07\/04\/sentence\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1185"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1185 \u2013 C\/P SYNACOMEX \u2013 Bl\u00e9 en vrac \u2013 Avaries \u00e0 la marchandise constitu\u00e9es d\u2019agglom\u00e9rats \u2013 Marchandise endommag\u00e9e avant chargement \u2013 Responsabilit\u00e9 des affr\u00e9teurs (oui). <\/strong>Dans ce litige o\u00f9 le demandeur \u00e9tait le fr\u00e9teur, les arbitres ont estim\u00e9 que les constatations des rapports d\u2019expertises constituaient un faisceau de pr\u00e9somptions forgeant leur intime conviction que les dommages \u00e0 la marchandise constat\u00e9s au d\u00e9chargement pr\u00e9existaient au chargement et que selon la charte-partie le fr\u00e9teur ne saurait en \u00eatre tenu responsable. L\u2019affr\u00e9teur a \u00e9t\u00e9 condamn\u00e9 \u00e0 r\u00e9parer les dommages au navire constitu\u00e9s des d\u00e9penses et pertes subis par le fr\u00e9teur y compris la perte cons\u00e9cutive \u00e0 l\u2019immobilisation du navire suite \u00e0 sa saisie conservatoire.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1185 \u2013 C\/P SYNACOMEX \u2013 Bl\u00e9 en vrac \u2013 Avaries \u00e0 la marchandise constitu\u00e9es d\u2019agglom\u00e9rats \u2013 Marchandise endommag\u00e9e avant chargement \u2013 Responsabilit\u00e9 des affr\u00e9teurs (oui). Dans ce litige o\u00f9 le demandeur \u00e9tait le fr\u00e9teur, les arbitres ont estim\u00e9 que les constatations des rapports d\u2019expertises constituaient un faisceau de pr\u00e9somptions forgeant leur intime conviction que<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2123","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2123","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2123"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2123\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2319,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2123\/revisions\/2319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}