{"id":2150,"date":"2010-06-17T14:45:54","date_gmt":"2010-06-17T13:45:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2150"},"modified":"2016-05-25T13:34:55","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T12:34:55","slug":"sentence-10","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2010\/06\/17\/sentence-10\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1176"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1176\u00a0\u2013 Second degr\u00e9 &#8211; Contrat de tonnage &#8211; Non ex\u00e9cution partielle par armateur &#8211; Saisies conservatoires \u00e0 New York (Rule B) &#8211; Int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir d\u2019une filiale (Oui) &#8211; Estoppel (Non) &#8211; Pr\u00e9judice pour affr\u00e8tement de remplacement. <\/strong>Une filiale d\u2019un groupe maritime a int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir parce que les pertes aff\u00e9rentes \u00e0 l&rsquo;affr\u00e8tement d\u2019un navire pour l\u2019ex\u00e9cution d\u2019un contrat conclu par sa maison m\u00e8re figurent dans ses comptes et que la jurisprudence fran\u00e7aise permet d\u2019\u00e9tablir l\u2019existence d\u2019une entit\u00e9 \u00e9conomique \u00e0 d\u00e9faut d\u2019entit\u00e9 juridique \u2013 L\u2019armateur ayant refus\u00e9 la nomination d\u2019un navire sans raison valable supporte le pr\u00e9judice subi par l\u2019affr\u00e9teur pour l\u2019affr\u00e8tement de remplacement \u2013 La demande reconventionnelle de l\u2019armateur pour manque \u00e0 gagner \u00e0 la suite du refus de l\u2019affr\u00e9teur d\u2019accepter un navire nomm\u00e9 pour un autre voyage est rejet\u00e9e car la d\u00e9cision de mettre le navire sur le march\u00e9 est volontaire et purement commerciale.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1176\u00a0\u2013 Second degr\u00e9 &#8211; Contrat de tonnage &#8211; Non ex\u00e9cution partielle par armateur &#8211; Saisies conservatoires \u00e0 New York (Rule B) &#8211; Int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir d\u2019une filiale (Oui) &#8211; Estoppel (Non) &#8211; Pr\u00e9judice pour affr\u00e8tement de remplacement. Une filiale d\u2019un groupe maritime a int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir parce que les pertes aff\u00e9rentes \u00e0 l&rsquo;affr\u00e8tement d\u2019un<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2150"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2150\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2334,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2150\/revisions\/2334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}