{"id":2177,"date":"2009-10-28T09:05:43","date_gmt":"2009-10-28T08:05:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2177"},"modified":"2016-05-25T13:50:48","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T12:50:48","slug":"sentence-19","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2009\/10\/28\/sentence-19\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1167"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1167 \u2013 Transport de riz en sacs sous B\/L \u2013 cargaison charg\u00e9e en hiver en Chine pour la C\u00f4te d\u2019Afrique \u2013 avaries par condensation \u2013 lettre de garantie donnant comp\u00e9tence \u00e0 la Chambre. <\/strong>La condensation, provoqu\u00e9e par la diff\u00e9rence de temp\u00e9ratures, \u00e0 l\u2019origine des avaries ne constitue pas un fait ext\u00e9rieur non imputable au transporteur qui connaissait ce risque pr\u00e9visible, car, pour \u00eatre exon\u00e9ratoire, le fait ext\u00e9rieur doit \u00eatre impr\u00e9visible et irr\u00e9sistible. Mais la responsabilit\u00e9 du transporteur doit \u00eatre att\u00e9nu\u00e9e car il n\u2019\u00e9tait pas le seul \u00e0 conna\u00eetre ce risque\u00a0; les int\u00e9r\u00eats cargaison, professionnels du n\u00e9goce du riz, connaissaient en effet le risque encouru par une cargaison charg\u00e9e gel\u00e9e \u00e0 destination d\u2019un pays tropical.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1167 \u2013 Transport de riz en sacs sous B\/L \u2013 cargaison charg\u00e9e en hiver en Chine pour la C\u00f4te d\u2019Afrique \u2013 avaries par condensation \u2013 lettre de garantie donnant comp\u00e9tence \u00e0 la Chambre. La condensation, provoqu\u00e9e par la diff\u00e9rence de temp\u00e9ratures, \u00e0 l\u2019origine des avaries ne constitue pas un fait ext\u00e9rieur non imputable au<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2177"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2177\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2361,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2177\/revisions\/2361"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}