{"id":2183,"date":"2009-09-30T09:12:58","date_gmt":"2009-09-30T08:12:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2183"},"modified":"2016-05-25T13:51:29","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T12:51:29","slug":"sentence-21","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2009\/09\/30\/sentence-21\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1165"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1165 \u2013 C\/P Supplytime \u2013 proc\u00e9dure d\u2019urgence \u2013 adage\u00a0: \u00ab\u00a0le criminel tient le civil en l\u2019\u00e9tat\u00a0\u00bb &#8211; sursis \u00e0 statuer (non). <\/strong>Suite \u00e0 une avarie moteurs et une suspension d\u2019affr\u00e8tement, un protocole d\u2019accord reconnaissant une cr\u00e9ance en faveur de l\u2019affr\u00e9teur n\u2019est pas respect\u00e9 par l\u2019armateur qui d\u00e9pose une plainte au p\u00e9nal contre l\u2019affr\u00e9teur. Le sursis \u00e0 statuer demand\u00e9 par l\u2019armateur est rejet\u00e9 au motif que l\u2019adage invoqu\u00e9 \u00ab\u00a0le criminel tient le civil en l\u2019\u00e9tat\u00a0\u00bb n\u2019est pas applicable \u00e0 l\u2019arbitrage international. Condamnation de l\u2019armateur \u00e0 s\u2019acquitter de la cr\u00e9ance reconnue au protocole d\u2019accord et de diverses d\u00e9penses pay\u00e9es par l\u2019affr\u00e9teur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1165 \u2013 C\/P Supplytime \u2013 proc\u00e9dure d\u2019urgence \u2013 adage\u00a0: \u00ab\u00a0le criminel tient le civil en l\u2019\u00e9tat\u00a0\u00bb &#8211; sursis \u00e0 statuer (non). Suite \u00e0 une avarie moteurs et une suspension d\u2019affr\u00e8tement, un protocole d\u2019accord reconnaissant une cr\u00e9ance en faveur de l\u2019affr\u00e9teur n\u2019est pas respect\u00e9 par l\u2019armateur qui d\u00e9pose une plainte au p\u00e9nal contre l\u2019affr\u00e9teur. Le<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2183"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2183\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2362,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2183\/revisions\/2362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}