{"id":2248,"date":"2007-11-28T10:59:02","date_gmt":"2007-11-28T09:59:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2248"},"modified":"2016-05-25T13:45:59","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T12:45:59","slug":"sentence-39","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2007\/11\/28\/sentence-39\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1147"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1147 \u2013 Contrat d’agence maritime – r\u00e9siliation – convention de Rome 19 juin 1980 – loi choisie par les parties – statut des agents commerciaux – art.L134-1 code de commerce – droit de l’agent \u00e0 indemnit\u00e9 (oui) – \u00e9valuation – droit du mandant \u00e0 r\u00e9parations (non).<\/strong> R\u00e9siliation unilat\u00e9rale d’un contrat d’agence maritime – droit fran\u00e7ais loi choisie par les parties conforme \u00e0 convention de Rome – application de l’art.L134 et suivants code de commerce – indemnit\u00e9 de r\u00e9siliation incluse dans r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration de l’agent, mais montant pas \u00e9tabli par celui-ci – le juge doit donc l’\u00e9valuer souverainement en tenant compte de l’anciennet\u00e9 des relations et la part prise dans la croissance \u00e9conomique duy mandant – le tribunal rejette la demande reconventionnelle car faute grave non prouv\u00e9e.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1147 \u2013 Contrat d’agence maritime – r\u00e9siliation – convention de Rome 19 juin 1980 – loi choisie par les parties – statut des agents commerciaux – art.L134-1 code de commerce – droit de l’agent \u00e0 indemnit\u00e9 (oui) – \u00e9valuation – droit du mandant \u00e0 r\u00e9parations (non). R\u00e9siliation unilat\u00e9rale d’un contrat d’agence maritime – droit<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2248"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2248\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2352,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2248\/revisions\/2352"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}