{"id":2272,"date":"2007-09-10T12:15:23","date_gmt":"2007-09-10T11:15:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2272"},"modified":"2016-05-25T13:42:27","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T12:42:27","slug":"sentence-44","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2007\/09\/10\/sentence-44\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1142"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1142\u00a0\u2013 Transport de riz en sacs sous B\/L \u2013 avaries et manquants \u2013 indemnit\u00e9 d&rsquo;assurance par d\u00e9l\u00e9gation \u2013 assureurs subrog\u00e9s \u2013 responsabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;armateur transporteur maritime, partag\u00e9e pour avaries de manutention, enti\u00e8re pour avaries par mouille. <\/strong>Le fait qu&rsquo;il y ait eu d\u00e9l\u00e9gation de paiement de l&rsquo;indemnit\u00e9 d&rsquo;assurance n&rsquo;affecte en rien le droit \u00e0 agir des assureurs subrog\u00e9s. Si, en application de la Convention de 1924 la responsabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;armateur ne peut \u00eatre que partielle s&rsquo;agissant des avaries et manquants li\u00e9s \u00e0 la manutention, cette responsabilit\u00e9 est totale s&rsquo;agissant de moisissures, le transporteur ayant l&rsquo;obligation de mettre le navire en \u00e9tat de navigabilit\u00e9 et d&rsquo;\u00e9quiper convenablement les cales, afin d&rsquo;\u00e9viter les effets de la condensation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1142\u00a0\u2013 Transport de riz en sacs sous B\/L \u2013 avaries et manquants \u2013 indemnit\u00e9 d&rsquo;assurance par d\u00e9l\u00e9gation \u2013 assureurs subrog\u00e9s \u2013 responsabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;armateur transporteur maritime, partag\u00e9e pour avaries de manutention, enti\u00e8re pour avaries par mouille. Le fait qu&rsquo;il y ait eu d\u00e9l\u00e9gation de paiement de l&rsquo;indemnit\u00e9 d&rsquo;assurance n&rsquo;affecte en rien le droit \u00e0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2272"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2347,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2272\/revisions\/2347"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}