{"id":2309,"date":"2006-10-03T13:07:05","date_gmt":"2006-10-03T12:07:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2309"},"modified":"2016-05-25T13:07:44","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T12:07:44","slug":"sentence-1132","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2006\/10\/03\/sentence-1132\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1132"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1132 \u2013 2d degr\u00e9 &#8211; c\/p Synacomex \u2013 Clause compromissoire de la c\/p incorpor\u00e9e dans le b\/l \u2013 Validit\u00e9 de la c\/p non sign\u00e9e. <\/strong>En arbitrage international, il suffit que le connaissement indique clairement que les clauses de la charte-partie \u00ab\u00a0including the law and arbitration clause\u00a0\u00bb sont incorpor\u00e9es pour que la partie au connaissement \u00e0 qui elle est oppos\u00e9e soit r\u00e9put\u00e9 l\u2019avoir tacitement accept\u00e9e. Le fait que la charte-partie ne soit pas sign\u00e9e n\u2019accepte pas sa validit\u00e9 s\u2019il est prouv\u00e9 qu\u2019elle est conforme \u00e0 la \u00ab\u00a0r\u00e9capitulation d\u2019affr\u00e8tement\u00a0\u00bb et que les connaissements y font r\u00e9f\u00e9rence. Les arbitres se d\u00e9clarent incomp\u00e9tents pour statuer sur une avarie commune sp\u00e9cifiquement soumise \u00e0 arbitrage \u00e0 Londres.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1132 \u2013 2d degr\u00e9 &#8211; c\/p Synacomex \u2013 Clause compromissoire de la c\/p incorpor\u00e9e dans le b\/l \u2013 Validit\u00e9 de la c\/p non sign\u00e9e. En arbitrage international, il suffit que le connaissement indique clairement que les clauses de la charte-partie \u00ab\u00a0including the law and arbitration clause\u00a0\u00bb sont incorpor\u00e9es pour que la partie au connaissement<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2309"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2310,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2309\/revisions\/2310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}