{"id":2315,"date":"2006-05-23T13:13:52","date_gmt":"2006-05-23T12:13:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2315"},"modified":"2016-05-25T13:14:26","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T12:14:26","slug":"sentence-1130","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2006\/05\/23\/sentence-1130\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1130"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1130\u00a0\u2013 c\/p Synacomex \u2013 Echouement \u2013 Port\/poste s\u00fbr \u2013 obligation de poursuivre le voyage. <\/strong>Le seul fait qu\u2019un navire, par suite d\u2019un fort courant rompe ses amarres et aille s\u2019\u00e9chouer sur des rochers ne suffit pas \u00e0 qualifier le port de chargement de non s\u00fbr. La raison principale de cet accident tient \u00e0 une man\u0153uvre inappropri\u00e9e du navire lors de la reprise des amarres. L\u2019armateur avait de surcro\u00eet l\u2019obligation de continuer le voyage apr\u00e8s les r\u00e9parations et la r\u00e9siliation de la charte-partie a \u00e9t\u00e9 effectu\u00e9e \u00e0 ses seuls torts et griefs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1130\u00a0\u2013 c\/p Synacomex \u2013 Echouement \u2013 Port\/poste s\u00fbr \u2013 obligation de poursuivre le voyage. Le seul fait qu\u2019un navire, par suite d\u2019un fort courant rompe ses amarres et aille s\u2019\u00e9chouer sur des rochers ne suffit pas \u00e0 qualifier le port de chargement de non s\u00fbr. La raison principale de cet accident tient \u00e0 une<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2315","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2315"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2315\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2316,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2315\/revisions\/2316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}