{"id":2386,"date":"2005-10-04T14:12:34","date_gmt":"2005-10-04T13:12:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2386"},"modified":"2016-05-25T14:13:21","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T13:13:21","slug":"sentence-1124","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2005\/10\/04\/sentence-1124\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1124"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1124 – Assurance de valeur r\u00e9siduelle – d\u00e9fiscalisation – construction – financement – Assurance garantissant risque de revente \u00e0 perte du navire \u00e0 l'(issue de la p\u00e9riode de d\u00e9fiscalisation – faillite de l’armateur – incxidence sur l’assurance -remise en cause de l’op\u00e9ration convenue – caducit\u00e9 de l’assurance. <\/strong>Dans le cadre d’une op\u00e9ration de d\u00e9fiscalisation une banque accepte de financer la construction de deux navires de croisi\u00e8re – coque nue \u00e0 l’armateur par copropri\u00e9t\u00e9 – option d’achat par le constructeur – si options pas lev\u00e9es banquier proc\u00e8de \u00e0 vente sur le march\u00e9 – assurance indemnise en cas de perte financi\u00e8re \u00e0 la vente – faillite – nouveau montage avec vente \u00e0 terme – comp\u00e9tence \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard du r\u00e9assureur (oui) car son activit\u00e9 fait pr\u00e9sumer qu’il avait connaissance de la clause d’arbitrage – restitution des primes pour la 1ere p\u00e9riode avant faillite (non) car risque existe d\u00e8s l’origine – caducit\u00e9 de l’assurance pour la 2e p\u00e9riode car le risque a disparu – restitution des primes prorata temporis (oui). A la demande des parties ce r\u00e9sum\u00e9 n’a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9dit\u00e9 dans le \u00ab\u00a0sommaire des sentences de la Chambre\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1124 – Assurance de valeur r\u00e9siduelle – d\u00e9fiscalisation – construction – financement – Assurance garantissant risque de revente \u00e0 perte du navire \u00e0 l'(issue de la p\u00e9riode de d\u00e9fiscalisation – faillite de l’armateur – incxidence sur l’assurance -remise en cause de l’op\u00e9ration convenue – caducit\u00e9 de l’assurance. Dans le cadre d’une op\u00e9ration de d\u00e9fiscalisation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2386"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2386\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2387,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2386\/revisions\/2387"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}