{"id":2389,"date":"2005-12-24T14:15:01","date_gmt":"2005-12-24T13:15:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2389"},"modified":"2016-05-25T14:15:40","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T13:15:40","slug":"sentence-1123","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2005\/12\/24\/sentence-1123\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1123"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1123 \u2013 Connaissement de charte-partie marqu\u00e9 \u00ab\u00a0FIOS\u00a0\u00bb. <\/strong>La mention \u00abF.I.O.S.\u00bb port\u00e9e sur les connaissements est opposable au tiers porteur et \u00e0 ses assureurs subrog\u00e9s car elle constitue une stipulation du contrat de transport concernant le chargement et la livraison de la cargaison. Elle ne peut donc \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme une simple clause financi\u00e8re.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1123 \u2013 Connaissement de charte-partie marqu\u00e9 \u00ab\u00a0FIOS\u00a0\u00bb. La mention \u00abF.I.O.S.\u00bb port\u00e9e sur les connaissements est opposable au tiers porteur et \u00e0 ses assureurs subrog\u00e9s car elle constitue une stipulation du contrat de transport concernant le chargement et la livraison de la cargaison. Elle ne peut donc \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme une simple clause financi\u00e8re.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2389"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2389\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2390,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2389\/revisions\/2390"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}