{"id":2392,"date":"2005-12-07T14:17:33","date_gmt":"2005-12-07T13:17:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2392"},"modified":"2016-05-25T14:18:04","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T13:18:04","slug":"sentence-1122","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2005\/12\/07\/sentence-1122\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1122"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1122\u00a0\u2013 Contrat d&rsquo;agence &#8211; Solde de comptes. <\/strong>Lorsque deux parties signataires d\u2019un contrat d\u2019agence commerciale de ligne r\u00e9guli\u00e8re contestent mutuellement leur bonne foi respective, les arbitres interpr\u00e8tent les clauses litigieuses en consid\u00e9ration des seuls termes du contrat et des conditions du trafic tels qu\u2019attest\u00e9s par une d\u00e9claration non contest\u00e9e du chargeur fournie \u00e0 la demande des arbitres.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1122\u00a0\u2013 Contrat d&rsquo;agence &#8211; Solde de comptes. Lorsque deux parties signataires d\u2019un contrat d\u2019agence commerciale de ligne r\u00e9guli\u00e8re contestent mutuellement leur bonne foi respective, les arbitres interpr\u00e8tent les clauses litigieuses en consid\u00e9ration des seuls termes du contrat et des conditions du trafic tels qu\u2019attest\u00e9s par une d\u00e9claration non contest\u00e9e du chargeur fournie \u00e0 la<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2392","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2392","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2392"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2392\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2393,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2392\/revisions\/2393"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}