{"id":2478,"date":"2004-06-17T09:34:30","date_gmt":"2004-06-17T08:34:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2478"},"modified":"2016-05-27T09:35:07","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T08:35:07","slug":"sentence-1101","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2004\/06\/17\/sentence-1101\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1101"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1101\u00a0\u2013 Abordage \u2013 Prescription \u2013 Evaluation des dommages. <\/strong>Lorsque les parties ont sign\u00e9 un accord pour r\u00e9partir 70\/30 les dommages subis lors d&rsquo;un abordage entre un cargo et deux chalutiers en p\u00eache, il n&rsquo;est pas possible d&rsquo;invoquer le prescription de l&rsquo;action. L&rsquo;arbitrage ne statue que sur le montant des dommages \u00e0 r\u00e9partir suivant l&rsquo;accord pr\u00e9cit\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1101\u00a0\u2013 Abordage \u2013 Prescription \u2013 Evaluation des dommages. Lorsque les parties ont sign\u00e9 un accord pour r\u00e9partir 70\/30 les dommages subis lors d&rsquo;un abordage entre un cargo et deux chalutiers en p\u00eache, il n&rsquo;est pas possible d&rsquo;invoquer le prescription de l&rsquo;action. L&rsquo;arbitrage ne statue que sur le montant des dommages \u00e0 r\u00e9partir suivant l&rsquo;accord<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2478"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2479,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2478\/revisions\/2479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}