{"id":2523,"date":"2003-07-31T10:25:07","date_gmt":"2003-07-31T09:25:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2523"},"modified":"2016-05-27T10:25:39","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T09:25:39","slug":"sentence-1086","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2003\/07\/31\/sentence-1086\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1086"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1086 &#8211; Sugar c\/p 1969 &#8211; clause FIOST &#8211; avaries et manquants occasionn\u00e9s par utilisation de crochets par manutentionnaires (owners servants) &#8211; responsabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;armateur garant des dommages caus\u00e9s par<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>manutentionnaires &#8211; surestaries &#8211; interversion de la prescription. <\/strong>Armateur doit garantir l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur du paiement des sommes dues par manutentionnaire, cette garantie ne pouvant \u00eatre que de la mesure de la responsabilit\u00e9 reconnue du manutentionnaire &#8211; il appartient donc au demandeur de poursuivre action contre manutentionnaire devant Tribunal d&rsquo;Anvers art. 2274 Code civil.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1086 &#8211; Sugar c\/p 1969 &#8211; clause FIOST &#8211; avaries et manquants occasionn\u00e9s par utilisation de crochets par manutentionnaires (owners servants) &#8211; responsabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;armateur garant des dommages caus\u00e9s par manutentionnaires &#8211; surestaries &#8211; interversion de la prescription. Armateur doit garantir l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur du paiement des sommes dues par manutentionnaire, cette garantie ne pouvant \u00eatre<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2523"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2523\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2524,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2523\/revisions\/2524"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}