{"id":2556,"date":"2002-12-13T11:19:32","date_gmt":"2002-12-13T10:19:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2556"},"modified":"2016-05-27T11:20:12","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T10:20:12","slug":"sentence-1075","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2002\/12\/13\/sentence-1075\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1075"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1075 \u2013 C\/P \u00ab\u00a0Synacomex\u00a0\u00bb \u2013 Inspection du navire \u2013 D\u00e9fectuosit\u00e9s constat\u00e9es. <\/strong>Apr\u00e8s chargement un navire est retenu par les autorit\u00e9s maritimes du port pour remise en \u00e9tat pendant 27 jours. A son arriv\u00e9e au port de d\u00e9chargement, il fait face \u00e0 une importante congestion portuaire. Les affr\u00e9teurs ne peuvent prendre argument du retard au port de chargement pour refuser de payer le fret et les surestaries \u00e0 destination. L&rsquo;armateur reste cependant responsable de ses fautes (innavigabilit\u00e9 \u00e0 l&rsquo;arriv\u00e9e au port de chargement) et doit indemniser partie du pr\u00e9judice subi par les affr\u00e9teurs r\u00e9sultant du retard au port de chargement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1075 \u2013 C\/P \u00ab\u00a0Synacomex\u00a0\u00bb \u2013 Inspection du navire \u2013 D\u00e9fectuosit\u00e9s constat\u00e9es. Apr\u00e8s chargement un navire est retenu par les autorit\u00e9s maritimes du port pour remise en \u00e9tat pendant 27 jours. A son arriv\u00e9e au port de d\u00e9chargement, il fait face \u00e0 une importante congestion portuaire. Les affr\u00e9teurs ne peuvent prendre argument du retard au<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2556"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2556\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2557,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2556\/revisions\/2557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}