{"id":2616,"date":"2001-11-20T10:06:36","date_gmt":"2001-11-20T09:06:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2616"},"modified":"2016-05-30T10:07:19","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T09:07:19","slug":"sentence-1055","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2001\/11\/20\/sentence-1055\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1055"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1055 \u2013 Synacomex &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; saisie du navire par r\u00e9ceptionnaire &#8211; non conformit\u00e9 de la cargaison (non) &#8211; surestaries et frais divers r\u00e9clam\u00e9s \u00e0 l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur pour immobilisation (non) &#8211; respect de l&rsquo;obligation de bonne foi par l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur (oui). <\/strong>R\u00e9ceptionnaire consid\u00e8re bl\u00e9 non conforme en raison d&rsquo;impuret\u00e9s &#8211; saisie lev\u00e9e par garantie mise en place par P\u00a7I &#8211; r\u00e9ceptionnaire d\u00e9bout\u00e9 de son action contre armateur devant tribunaux tunisiens &#8211; pas de surestaries car d\u00e9chargement dans le temps allou\u00e9 0affr\u00e9teurs \u00e9trangers \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure en Tunisie, donc demande en garantie irrecevable et sursis \u00e0 statuer rejet\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1055 \u2013 Synacomex &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; saisie du navire par r\u00e9ceptionnaire &#8211; non conformit\u00e9 de la cargaison (non) &#8211; surestaries et frais divers r\u00e9clam\u00e9s \u00e0 l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur pour immobilisation (non) &#8211; respect de l&rsquo;obligation de bonne foi par l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur (oui). R\u00e9ceptionnaire consid\u00e8re bl\u00e9 non conforme en raison d&rsquo;impuret\u00e9s &#8211; saisie lev\u00e9e par garantie<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2616","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2616","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2616"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2616\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2617,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2616\/revisions\/2617"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2616"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}