{"id":2648,"date":"2001-03-30T11:27:37","date_gmt":"2001-03-30T10:27:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2648"},"modified":"2016-05-30T11:28:13","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T10:28:13","slug":"sentence-1046","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2001\/03\/30\/sentence-1046\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1046"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1046 \u2013 Construction – exploitation industrielle d’\u00e9levage de poissons – effondrement de structure – bureau d’\u00e9tude – installateur, mission limit\u00e9e, responsabilit\u00e9 (non) – armateur, ma\u00eetre de l’ouvrage – immixtion caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e – responsabilit\u00e9 (oui). <\/strong>D\u00e9termination des responsabilit\u00e9s cons\u00e9cutives \u00e0 l’effondrement d’une partie d’une barge pour \u00e9levage de saumons – r\u00e9alisation de la barge con\u00e7ue par armateur sur base de plans \u00e9tablis par un bureau d’\u00e9tudes et install\u00e9e par un constructeur – \u00e9croulement du tunnel d’\u00e9vacuation des eaux pollu\u00e9es – perte importante de smolts – apr\u00e8s un an d’exploitation la cale avait \u00e9t\u00e9 ass\u00e9ch\u00e9e et l’armateur avait proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 des r\u00e9parations (remplacement de vannes) sans en parler ni au bureau d’\u00e9tudes ni \u00e0 l’installateur – pas de lien de causalit\u00e9 entre faute du bureau d’\u00e9tudes (d\u00e9biteur d’une obligation de moyens) et le sinistre – immixtion incontestable de l’armateur dans la conception et la r\u00e9alisation de l’ouvrage – absence de collaboration – responsabilit\u00e9 partag\u00e9e 10% pour bureau d’\u00e9tudes, 90% pour armateur – calcul du pr\u00e9judice.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1046 \u2013 Construction – exploitation industrielle d’\u00e9levage de poissons – effondrement de structure – bureau d’\u00e9tude – installateur, mission limit\u00e9e, responsabilit\u00e9 (non) – armateur, ma\u00eetre de l’ouvrage – immixtion caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e – responsabilit\u00e9 (oui). D\u00e9termination des responsabilit\u00e9s cons\u00e9cutives \u00e0 l’effondrement d’une partie d’une barge pour \u00e9levage de saumons – r\u00e9alisation de la barge con\u00e7ue par<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2648"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2648\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2649,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2648\/revisions\/2649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}