{"id":2651,"date":"2001-01-31T11:30:46","date_gmt":"2001-01-31T10:30:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2651"},"modified":"2016-05-30T11:32:16","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T10:32:16","slug":"sentence-1045","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2001\/01\/31\/sentence-1045\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1045"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1045 \u2013c\/p Synacomex 90 – riz en sacs – avaries cargaison – connaissements – r\u00e9clamation des destinataires derniers endossataires – comp\u00e9tence – opposabilit\u00e9 de la convention d’arbitrage de la c\/p – sentence avant dire droit – intervention volontaire de l’affr\u00e9teur – int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir – responsabilit\u00e9 fr\u00e9teur pour manquants (oui) – pour mouille (oui). <\/strong>Avaries constat\u00e9es contradictoirement : sacs d\u00e9chir\u00e9s en vidange, sacs mouill\u00e9s par condensation, sacs manquants – comp\u00e9tence de la Chambre car B\/l contiennent une clause incorporant toutes les clauses de la c\/p d\u00e9sign\u00e9e au verso – le fr\u00e9teur ne peut pr\u00e9tendre ignorer l’existence et port\u00e9e de cette clause (art.1443 NCPC) – clause de la c\/P qui dispose que le fr\u00e9teur est en aucun cas responsable des pertes et dommages \u00e0 cargaison qui se produirait avant le chargement et apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9chargement est incorpor\u00e9e au B\/L – clause de bastingage – responsabilit\u00e9 du fr\u00e9teur s’\u00e9tend aux seules pertes et dommages apr\u00e8s le chargement et avant le d\u00e9chargement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1045 \u2013c\/p Synacomex 90 – riz en sacs – avaries cargaison – connaissements – r\u00e9clamation des destinataires derniers endossataires – comp\u00e9tence – opposabilit\u00e9 de la convention d’arbitrage de la c\/p – sentence avant dire droit – intervention volontaire de l’affr\u00e9teur – int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir – responsabilit\u00e9 fr\u00e9teur pour manquants (oui) – pour mouille (oui).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2651"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2651\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2653,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2651\/revisions\/2653"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}