{"id":2664,"date":"2000-11-04T11:42:14","date_gmt":"2000-11-04T10:42:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2664"},"modified":"2016-05-30T11:42:50","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T10:42:50","slug":"sentence-1041","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2000\/11\/04\/sentence-1041\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1041"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1041 \u2013 Conline Booking Note &#8211; mat\u00e9riel d&rsquo;installation raffinerie en cours de construction &#8211; clause de transit time de 30 jours -d\u00e9passement du transit time &#8211; demande ed domm\u00f9ages int\u00e9r\u00eats pour retard de livraison &#8211; armateur responsable (oui) &#8211; int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir &#8211; lien de causalit\u00e9 entre faute contractuelle et dommages subis &#8211; impr\u00e9visibilit\u00e9 des dommages (non). <\/strong>Transit time \u00e9l\u00e9ment constitutif du contrat &#8211; en acceptant un voyage interm\u00e9diaire \u00e0 des dates ne permettant pas de respecter le transit time l&rsquo;armateur a commis une faute contractuelle et la demande en DI a \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9e bien fond\u00e9e &#8211; l&rsquo;armateur ne pouvait ignorer qu&rsquo;un retard \u00e0 la livraison ne manquerait pas d&rsquo;entra\u00eener des dommages &#8211; condamnation au remboursement des dommages ayant un lien direct avec la survenance du retard.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1041 \u2013 Conline Booking Note &#8211; mat\u00e9riel d&rsquo;installation raffinerie en cours de construction &#8211; clause de transit time de 30 jours -d\u00e9passement du transit time &#8211; demande ed domm\u00f9ages int\u00e9r\u00eats pour retard de livraison &#8211; armateur responsable (oui) &#8211; int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir &#8211; lien de causalit\u00e9 entre faute contractuelle et dommages subis &#8211; impr\u00e9visibilit\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2664"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2664\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2665,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2664\/revisions\/2665"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}