{"id":2673,"date":"2000-06-15T12:46:43","date_gmt":"2000-06-15T11:46:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2673"},"modified":"2016-05-30T12:49:02","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T11:49:02","slug":"sentence-1038","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2000\/06\/15\/sentence-1038\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1038"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1038 &#8211; c\/p Synacomex &#8211; B\/L Congenbill 78 &#8211; B\/L incorporant termes de la c\/p &#8211; qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 agir en arbitrage du tiers porteur (oui) &#8211; avaries \u00e0 la cargaison par condensation et manutention brutale &#8211; art.3.2 de la Convention de Bruxelles de 1924 &#8211; condamnation de l&rsquo;armateur propri\u00e9taire identifi\u00e9 par son timbre au B\/L.<\/strong> Tiers porteur du B\/L recevable &#8211; quand un B\/L fait r\u00e9f\u00e9rence explicite \u00e0 la c\/p, il y a lieu de consid\u00e9rer que la clause de la c\/p attribuant comp\u00e9tence \u00e0 la Chambre se trouve par l\u00e0 m\u00eame incorpor\u00e9e au B\/L (voir sentence 653) -transporteur responsable des dommages reconnus caus\u00e9s par bu\u00e9e de cale et manutentions brutales en application de la Convention &#8211; timbre de l&rsquo;armateur identifiant formellement le transporteur (Cassation 3.3.92 Ofer c\/ Tokyo marine and Fire Insurance).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1038 &#8211; c\/p Synacomex &#8211; B\/L Congenbill 78 &#8211; B\/L incorporant termes de la c\/p &#8211; qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 agir en arbitrage du tiers porteur (oui) &#8211; avaries \u00e0 la cargaison par condensation et manutention brutale &#8211; art.3.2 de la Convention de Bruxelles de 1924 &#8211; condamnation de l&rsquo;armateur propri\u00e9taire identifi\u00e9 par son timbre au<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2673"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2673\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2674,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2673\/revisions\/2674"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}