{"id":2696,"date":"2000-05-15T13:10:15","date_gmt":"2000-05-15T12:10:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2696"},"modified":"2016-05-30T13:10:52","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T12:10:52","slug":"sentence-1032-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2000\/05\/15\/sentence-1032-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1032"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1032 \u2013 C\/P Africanphos – phosphate en vrac – C\/P coque nue – gestion du navire – recevabilit\u00e9 \u00e0 l’encontre de l’armateur propri\u00e9taire (non) – responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle du fr\u00e9teur au voyage (oui) – saisie du navire – dur\u00e9e excessive du voyage – pr\u00e9judice pour dommages \u00e0 la marchandise (oui). <\/strong>Navire fr\u00e9t\u00e9 coque nue, en time charter et au voyage – escale pour r\u00e9parations – trois saisies par cr\u00e9anciers du navire – retard important au d\u00e9chargement – dommage \u00e0 la marchandise d\u00fb \u00e0 dur\u00e9e excessive du voyage dont est responsable le fr\u00e9teur – action de l’affr\u00e9teur au voyage irrecevable \u00e0 l’encontre de l’armateur – idem pour responsabilit\u00e9 d\u00e9lictuelle le propri\u00e9taire \u00e9tant \u00e9tranger \u00e0 la gestion – pr\u00e9judice pour surco\u00fbt de manutention, traitement et stockage, camionnage et \u00e9mottage – pr\u00e9judices financiers pour retard de paiement (non).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1032 \u2013 C\/P Africanphos – phosphate en vrac – C\/P coque nue – gestion du navire – recevabilit\u00e9 \u00e0 l’encontre de l’armateur propri\u00e9taire (non) – responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle du fr\u00e9teur au voyage (oui) – saisie du navire – dur\u00e9e excessive du voyage – pr\u00e9judice pour dommages \u00e0 la marchandise (oui). Navire fr\u00e9t\u00e9 coque nue, en<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2696"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2696\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2697,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2696\/revisions\/2697"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}