{"id":2717,"date":"1999-12-08T13:29:07","date_gmt":"1999-12-08T12:29:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2717"},"modified":"2016-05-30T13:29:41","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T12:29:41","slug":"sentence-1025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1999\/12\/08\/sentence-1025\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1025 \u2013 c\/p affr\u00e8tement coque nue &#8211; Convention de g\u00e9rance technique et commerciale &#8211; demande de r\u00e8glement de factures impay\u00e9es et de r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration de g\u00e9rance &#8211; demandes reconventionnelles sur base de manquement au devoir de conseil et fautes dans la g\u00e9rance -responsabilit\u00e9 partag\u00e9e. <\/strong>Le navire choisi a \u00e9t\u00e9 visit\u00e9 avant achat et livraison avec classe confirm\u00e9e &#8211; conclusion contrat coque nue et de g\u00e9rance &#8211; apr\u00e8s quatre mois exploitation cessation de toute activit\u00e9 due \u00e0 non conformit\u00e9 avec r\u00e9glementation &#8211; demande d&rsquo;arbitrage du g\u00e9rant pour remboursement factures rest\u00e9es impay\u00e9es et indemnit\u00e9 de g\u00e9rance &#8211; demandes reconventionnelles pour loyer impay\u00e9s, r\u00e9parations et pertes exploitation &#8211; futur g\u00e9rant responsable pour ne pas avoir relever les d\u00e9fauts de structure &#8211; nouveau propri\u00e9taire imprudent en prenant livraison sans assistance d&rsquo;un professionnel &#8211; propri\u00e9taire responsable de la gestion commerciale qu&rsquo;il avait enti\u00e8rement assum\u00e9e &#8211; responsabilit\u00e9 pour perte d&rsquo;exploitation partag\u00e9e 70% g\u00e9rant, 30% propri\u00e9taire.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1025 \u2013 c\/p affr\u00e8tement coque nue &#8211; Convention de g\u00e9rance technique et commerciale &#8211; demande de r\u00e8glement de factures impay\u00e9es et de r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration de g\u00e9rance &#8211; demandes reconventionnelles sur base de manquement au devoir de conseil et fautes dans la g\u00e9rance -responsabilit\u00e9 partag\u00e9e. Le navire choisi a \u00e9t\u00e9 visit\u00e9 avant achat et livraison avec<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2717"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2717\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2718,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2717\/revisions\/2718"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}