{"id":2723,"date":"1999-12-22T13:33:37","date_gmt":"1999-12-22T12:33:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2723"},"modified":"2016-05-30T13:34:10","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T12:34:10","slug":"sentence-1023","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1999\/12\/22\/sentence-1023\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1023"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1023 \u2013 Synacomex 90 &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; pr\u00e9sentation hors cancelling &#8211; Notice of readiness valablement refus\u00e9e pour cales pas pr\u00eates \u00e0 charger &#8211; r\u00e9siliation c\/p par affr\u00e9teur &#8211; affr\u00e8tement d&rsquo;un navire de remplacement &#8211; demande de compensation du diff\u00e9rentiel de fret &#8211; demande reconventionnelle pour r\u00e9siliation abusive (non) \u2013 mis pr\u00e9sentation. <\/strong>Navire arriv\u00e9 15 minutes apr\u00e8s cancelling date &#8211; notice refus\u00e9e pour odeur de poisson et rouille en cales &#8211; rejet de la notice confirm\u00e9 par affr\u00e9teur qui r\u00e9silie la c\/p apr\u00e8s avoir re\u00e7u tout apaisement de l&rsquo;armateur quant au nettoyage des cales &#8211; affr\u00e8tement d&rsquo;un navire de remplacement &#8211; attente mar\u00e9e risque nautique &#8211; aucune volont\u00e9 des parties sur extension cancelling \u2013 mis pr\u00e9sentation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1023 \u2013 Synacomex 90 &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; pr\u00e9sentation hors cancelling &#8211; Notice of readiness valablement refus\u00e9e pour cales pas pr\u00eates \u00e0 charger &#8211; r\u00e9siliation c\/p par affr\u00e9teur &#8211; affr\u00e8tement d&rsquo;un navire de remplacement &#8211; demande de compensation du diff\u00e9rentiel de fret &#8211; demande reconventionnelle pour r\u00e9siliation abusive (non) \u2013 mis pr\u00e9sentation. Navire<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2723"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2723\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2724,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2723\/revisions\/2724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}