{"id":2729,"date":"1999-12-06T13:38:29","date_gmt":"1999-12-06T12:38:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2729"},"modified":"2016-05-30T13:39:02","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T12:39:02","slug":"sentence-1021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1999\/12\/06\/sentence-1021\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1021"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1021 \u2013 Contrat de transport – tourets de c\u00e2bles – comp\u00e9tence \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard du P and I – d\u00e9sarrimage de la cargaison – non respect des r\u00e8gles de l’art dans l’arrimage et saisissage des tourets – faute commerciale – faute nautique concernant calculs de stabilit\u00e9 (non) – faiblesse de l’emballage (non) – absence de diligence du chargeur (oui) – partage de responsabilit\u00e9 (85% pour transporteur)-arbitres amiables compositeurs. <\/strong>D\u00e9sarrimage provoquant escale pour r\u00e9arrimage et ressaisissage – saisie du navire – lettre garantie du P and I – Incomp\u00e9tence \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard du P and I, l’action engag\u00e9e ne d\u00e9coulant pas du contrat de transport mais de la lettre de garantie – mauvais arrimage et insuffisance de saisissage \u00e0 l’origine des dommages – pr\u00e9tendue erreur du second capitaine dans calcul de stabilit\u00e9 sans lien de causalit\u00e9 avec dommages – d\u00e9sint\u00e9ressement manifeste du chargeur att\u00e9nue responsabilit\u00e9 du transporteur retenue pour 85%.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 1021 \u2013 Contrat de transport – tourets de c\u00e2bles – comp\u00e9tence \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard du P and I – d\u00e9sarrimage de la cargaison – non respect des r\u00e8gles de l’art dans l’arrimage et saisissage des tourets – faute commerciale – faute nautique concernant calculs de stabilit\u00e9 (non) – faiblesse de l’emballage (non) – absence de<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2729","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2729","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2729"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2729\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2730,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2729\/revisions\/2730"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2729"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2729"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2729"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}