{"id":2738,"date":"1999-10-21T13:45:50","date_gmt":"1999-10-21T12:45:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2738"},"modified":"2016-05-30T13:46:20","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T12:46:20","slug":"sentence-1018","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1999\/10\/21\/sentence-1018\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1018"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1018\u00a0&#8211; c\/p Synacomex 90 &#8211; transport de 2 qualit\u00e9s de grain sur un navire \u00ab\u00a0boxship\u00a0\u00bb- cales insuffisamment remplies bien que navire charg\u00e9 \u00e0 ses marques &#8211; coefficient d&rsquo;encombrement &#8211; n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d&rsquo;ensacher pour stabilit\u00e9 &#8211; temps perdu et frais en r\u00e9sultant. <\/strong>Cale unique divis\u00e9e en trois compartiments par cloisons amovibles &#8211; positionnements des cloisons calcul\u00e9s en fonction des coefficient d&rsquo;encombrement du grain garantis par affr\u00e9teur &#8211; volume des 2 compartiments charg\u00e9s de grains trop important et n\u00e9cessitant ensachage pour \u00e9viter ripage du grain &#8211; erreur de description sur une des qualit\u00e9 de grain &#8211; port en lourd utile pas conforme \u00e0 sa description &#8211; partage des responsabilit\u00e9 50\/50.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1018\u00a0&#8211; c\/p Synacomex 90 &#8211; transport de 2 qualit\u00e9s de grain sur un navire \u00ab\u00a0boxship\u00a0\u00bb- cales insuffisamment remplies bien que navire charg\u00e9 \u00e0 ses marques &#8211; coefficient d&rsquo;encombrement &#8211; n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d&rsquo;ensacher pour stabilit\u00e9 &#8211; temps perdu et frais en r\u00e9sultant. Cale unique divis\u00e9e en trois compartiments par cloisons amovibles &#8211; positionnements des cloisons calcul\u00e9s<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2738","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2738"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2738\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2739,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2738\/revisions\/2739"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}