{"id":2789,"date":"1999-05-03T14:37:02","date_gmt":"1999-05-03T13:37:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2789"},"modified":"2016-05-30T14:37:32","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T13:37:32","slug":"sentence-1001","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1999\/05\/03\/sentence-1001\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1001"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1001 &#8211; Contrat de g\u00e9rance (management contract)-Budget pr\u00e9visionnel-port\u00e9e-obligations du g\u00e9rant-obligations de moyens- r\u00e9siliation du contrat par armateur -indemnit\u00e9 de pr\u00e9avis- clause p\u00e9nale(non) &#8211; limitation au gain pr\u00e9vu-saisie du navire-obligation de coop\u00e9ration du saisissant. <\/strong>D\u00e9passement du budget pr\u00e9visionnel &#8211; demande en paiement des factures non r\u00e9gl\u00e9es par l&rsquo;armateur- obligation du g\u00e9rant n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas de se tenir dans le cadre du budget mais d&rsquo;apporter toute son attention au maintien du navire dans un \u00e9tat d&rsquo;utilisation efficace et \u00e9conomique-obligations de moyens &#8211; demande reconventionnelle de remise en \u00e9tat du navire rejet\u00e9e car il n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas prouv\u00e9 que telle ou telle d\u00e9pense \u00e9tait imputable \u00e0 une faute du g\u00e9rant- saisie du navire : le g\u00e9rant n&rsquo;avait pas fait preuve de la coop\u00e9ration qui lui \u00e9tait impos\u00e9e par les dispositions de l&rsquo;art.1134 du C.C.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1001 &#8211; Contrat de g\u00e9rance (management contract)-Budget pr\u00e9visionnel-port\u00e9e-obligations du g\u00e9rant-obligations de moyens- r\u00e9siliation du contrat par armateur -indemnit\u00e9 de pr\u00e9avis- clause p\u00e9nale(non) &#8211; limitation au gain pr\u00e9vu-saisie du navire-obligation de coop\u00e9ration du saisissant. D\u00e9passement du budget pr\u00e9visionnel &#8211; demande en paiement des factures non r\u00e9gl\u00e9es par l&rsquo;armateur- obligation du g\u00e9rant n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas de se<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2789","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2789"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2789\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2790,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2789\/revisions\/2790"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}