{"id":2795,"date":"1999-02-02T14:43:30","date_gmt":"1999-02-02T13:43:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2795"},"modified":"2016-05-30T14:44:05","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T13:44:05","slug":"sentence-999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1999\/02\/02\/sentence-999\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 999"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 999 – Gencon – Bobines de c\u00e2ble – avaries cargaison suite saisissage inappropri\u00e9 – recevabilit\u00e9 de l’action – Responsabilit\u00e9 du saisissage – fr\u00e9teur (non) – clauses relatives \u00e0 l’arrimage – interpr\u00e9tation \u2013 application. Convention de Bruxelles (non) – principe de la libert\u00e9 contractuelle. <\/strong>Bobines de c\u00e2ble avari\u00e9es au d\u00e9chargement suite d\u00e9faut de saisissage – r\u00e9ceptionnaires indemnis\u00e9s par fr\u00e9teur – diverses clauses relatives \u00e0 l’arrimage – d\u00e9faut d’arrimage affectant la bonne conservation de la marchandise – le fr\u00e9teur n’a pas manqu\u00e9 \u00e0 ses obligations \u2013 affr\u00e9teur responsable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 999 – Gencon – Bobines de c\u00e2ble – avaries cargaison suite saisissage inappropri\u00e9 – recevabilit\u00e9 de l’action – Responsabilit\u00e9 du saisissage – fr\u00e9teur (non) – clauses relatives \u00e0 l’arrimage – interpr\u00e9tation \u2013 application. Convention de Bruxelles (non) – principe de la libert\u00e9 contractuelle. Bobines de c\u00e2ble avari\u00e9es au d\u00e9chargement suite d\u00e9faut de saisissage –<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2795"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2795\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2796,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2795\/revisions\/2796"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}