{"id":2798,"date":"1999-01-29T14:46:54","date_gmt":"1999-01-29T13:46:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2798"},"modified":"2016-05-30T14:47:30","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T13:47:31","slug":"sentence-998","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1999\/01\/29\/sentence-998\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 998"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 998 – Synacomex – pommes de terre en sacs – recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande – utilisation du temps de planche par l’affr\u00e9teur – d\u00e9lai pour remise des B\/L – saisie par affaires maritimes – convention SOLAS \u2013 marchandises avari\u00e9es au d\u00e9chargement – refus de d\u00e9chargement par autorit\u00e9s portuaires – surestaries – fret compl\u00e9mentaire (non). <\/strong>Retard dans remise des B\/L – interdiction de sortie du navire pour documents non conformes aux exigence de la Convention SOLAS \u2013 d\u00e9part autoris\u00e9 – innavigabilit\u00e9 (non) – d\u00e9chargement ininterrompu avec reliquat de marchandise \u00e0 bord – bonus vers\u00e9 \u00e0 l’\u00e9quipage par affr\u00e9teur pour disposer de cette marchandise – droit de l’affr\u00e9teur d’utiliser \u00e0 sa guise le temps de planche \u00e0 condition que le navire ne soit pas immobilis\u00e9 de fa\u00e7on anormale – d\u00e9lai de remise des B\/L jug\u00e9 raisonnable – temps de planche interrompu pendant saisie du navire.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 998 – Synacomex – pommes de terre en sacs – recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande – utilisation du temps de planche par l’affr\u00e9teur – d\u00e9lai pour remise des B\/L – saisie par affaires maritimes – convention SOLAS \u2013 marchandises avari\u00e9es au d\u00e9chargement – refus de d\u00e9chargement par autorit\u00e9s portuaires – surestaries – fret compl\u00e9mentaire (non).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2798"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2798\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2799,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2798\/revisions\/2799"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}