{"id":2803,"date":"1998-12-31T14:55:29","date_gmt":"1998-12-31T13:55:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2803"},"modified":"2016-05-30T14:56:07","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T13:56:07","slug":"sentence-997","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1998\/12\/31\/sentence-997\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 997"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 997 &#8211; NYPE 81 &#8211; safe port safe berth &#8211; imprudence du Capitaine &#8211; responsabilit\u00e9 partag\u00e9e &#8211; int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir de l&rsquo;armateur (oui) &#8211; indemnisation par assureur inopposable \u00e0 l&rsquo;armateur &#8211; avarie de manutention au radar. <\/strong>Accostage \u00e0 Beyrouth \u00e0 un quai d\u00e9labr\u00e9 &#8211; vent et ressac &#8211; absence d&rsquo;aide des autorit\u00e9s portuaires &#8211; dommages constat\u00e9s par St\u00e9 de classification &#8211; r\u00e9parations apr\u00e8s restitution -recevabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;action- contrat assurance \u00e9tranger \u00e0 l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur &#8211; facult\u00e9 de subroger et non obligation &#8211; manque de prudence du Capitaine &#8211; d\u00e9faillance des autorit\u00e9s du port &#8211; dur\u00e9e des r\u00e9parations diminu\u00e9e de celle d&rsquo;un arr\u00eat technique ordinaire.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 997 &#8211; NYPE 81 &#8211; safe port safe berth &#8211; imprudence du Capitaine &#8211; responsabilit\u00e9 partag\u00e9e &#8211; int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir de l&rsquo;armateur (oui) &#8211; indemnisation par assureur inopposable \u00e0 l&rsquo;armateur &#8211; avarie de manutention au radar. Accostage \u00e0 Beyrouth \u00e0 un quai d\u00e9labr\u00e9 &#8211; vent et ressac &#8211; absence d&rsquo;aide des autorit\u00e9s portuaires &#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2803"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2803\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2804,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2803\/revisions\/2804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}