{"id":2808,"date":"1999-01-08T15:02:10","date_gmt":"1999-01-08T14:02:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2808"},"modified":"2016-05-30T15:02:43","modified_gmt":"2016-05-30T14:02:43","slug":"sentence-996-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1999\/01\/08\/sentence-996-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 996"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 996 &#8211; c\/p Synacomex 90 &#8211; graines de coton en vrac &#8211; non-paiement du fret, faux fret et surestaries &#8211; retard dans op\u00e9rations de chargement &#8211; refus du Capitaine de charger &#8211; marchandise non conforme \u00e0 sa description &#8211; d\u00e9fendeurs d\u00e9faillants. <\/strong>Marchandise humide et \u00e9chauff\u00e9e refus\u00e9e par Capitaine &#8211; retard dans op\u00e9rations de chargement &#8211; op\u00e9rations suppl\u00e9mentaires de d\u00e9chargement de la marchandise avari\u00e9e, \u00e9talement et choulage en cale pour l&rsquo;a\u00e9rer &#8211; marchandise non disponible &#8211; factures de fret, faux fret et surestaries impay\u00e9es. Refus du Capitaine pour des raisons \u00e9videntes de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 car graines de coton susceptibles de combustion spontan\u00e9e &#8211; motifs du retard sont enti\u00e8rement le fait des affr\u00e9teurs -fret, faux fret et surestaries sont dus &#8211; art. 700 (oui) car armateurs contraints \u00e0 avoir recours \u00e0 l&rsquo;arbitrage pour recouvrer ses cr\u00e9ances.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 996 &#8211; c\/p Synacomex 90 &#8211; graines de coton en vrac &#8211; non-paiement du fret, faux fret et surestaries &#8211; retard dans op\u00e9rations de chargement &#8211; refus du Capitaine de charger &#8211; marchandise non conforme \u00e0 sa description &#8211; d\u00e9fendeurs d\u00e9faillants. Marchandise humide et \u00e9chauff\u00e9e refus\u00e9e par Capitaine &#8211; retard dans op\u00e9rations de chargement<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2808"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2808\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2809,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2808\/revisions\/2809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}