{"id":2817,"date":"1998-12-10T10:28:47","date_gmt":"1998-12-10T09:28:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2817"},"modified":"2016-05-31T10:29:38","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T09:29:38","slug":"sentence-995","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1998\/12\/10\/sentence-995\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 995"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 995 &#8211; c\/p Synacomex 90 &#8211; orge en vrac &#8211; faux fret cons\u00e9cutif au chargement incomplet d&rsquo;une cale, coefficient d&rsquo;encombrement de la marchandise &#8211; r\u00e9f\u00e9rence aux normes connues du march\u00e9. <\/strong>Aucune indication ni garantie de densit\u00e9 ou encombrement &#8211; faute de marchandise cale 1 en vidange, affr\u00e9teur acceptant de payer 150 T de faux fret- coefficient d&rsquo;encombrement constat\u00e9 54,47 cf\/tm &#8211; armateur r\u00e9clame en + 567,5 T de faux fret correspondant \u00e0 la quantit\u00e9 appel\u00e9e par Capitaine &#8211; l&rsquo;arbitre a estim\u00e9 que 54,47 d\u00e9passait les normes connues du march\u00e9 des c\u00e9r\u00e9ales (52 \u00e0 54 cf) et a calcul\u00e9 la capacit\u00e9 du navire en orge cubant 54 cf soit faux fret de 111 T.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 995 &#8211; c\/p Synacomex 90 &#8211; orge en vrac &#8211; faux fret cons\u00e9cutif au chargement incomplet d&rsquo;une cale, coefficient d&rsquo;encombrement de la marchandise &#8211; r\u00e9f\u00e9rence aux normes connues du march\u00e9. Aucune indication ni garantie de densit\u00e9 ou encombrement &#8211; faute de marchandise cale 1 en vidange, affr\u00e9teur acceptant de payer 150 T de faux<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2817"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2817\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2818,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2817\/revisions\/2818"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}