{"id":2845,"date":"1998-06-29T10:46:40","date_gmt":"1998-06-29T09:46:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2845"},"modified":"2016-05-31T10:47:28","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T09:47:28","slug":"sentence-988","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1998\/06\/29\/sentence-988\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 988"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 988 &#8211; Synacomex 90 &#8211; Bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; recevabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;action de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur et du destinataire &#8211; incorporation des clauses de la c\/p dans le connaissement pr\u00e9judice ind\u00e9pendant des caract\u00e9ristiques du navire tel que d\u00e9crit en c\/p &#8211; responsabilit\u00e9 du fr\u00e9teur pour retard \u00e0 la livraison r\u00e9sultant d&rsquo;un d\u00e9routement. <\/strong> D\u00e9routement du navire \u00e0 l&rsquo;initiative de l&rsquo;armateur &#8211; retard occasionnant une rupture de stock chez le destinataire &#8211; droit d&rsquo;agir du destinataire du fait de la stipulation \u00ab\u00a0conditions of carriage\u00a0\u00bb du connaissement incorporant les clauses de la c\/p et donc la clause d&rsquo;arbitrage &#8211; obligation de diligence pour ex\u00e9cuter le voyage &#8211; d\u00e9routement pour motif commercial.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 988 &#8211; Synacomex 90 &#8211; Bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; recevabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;action de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur et du destinataire &#8211; incorporation des clauses de la c\/p dans le connaissement pr\u00e9judice ind\u00e9pendant des caract\u00e9ristiques du navire tel que d\u00e9crit en c\/p &#8211; responsabilit\u00e9 du fr\u00e9teur pour retard \u00e0 la livraison r\u00e9sultant d&rsquo;un d\u00e9routement. D\u00e9routement du navire \u00e0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2845"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2845\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2847,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2845\/revisions\/2847"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}