{"id":2851,"date":"1998-06-30T10:56:56","date_gmt":"1998-06-30T09:56:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2851"},"modified":"2016-05-31T10:57:48","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T09:57:48","slug":"sentence-987","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1998\/06\/30\/sentence-987\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 987"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 987 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; riz en sacs &#8211; fumigation au d\u00e9chargement &#8211; co\u00fbt de la d\u00e9sinsectisation et temps perdu compte affr\u00e9teur &#8211; frais de port suppl\u00e9mentaires compte armateur &#8211; vice propre de la marchandise &#8211; jugement par d\u00e9faut. Proc\u00e9dure d&rsquo;urgence. <\/strong>Responsabilit\u00e9 en temps et co\u00fbt de la d\u00e9sinsectisation &#8211; origine de l&rsquo;infestation d&rsquo;insectes &#8211; vice propre de la marchandise &#8211; temps comptant comme temps de planche &#8211; quay dues (droits de quai) imputables \u00e0 l&rsquo;armateur couvert par les surestaries &#8211; Arbitrage d&rsquo;urgence en raison de la situation financi\u00e8re difficile de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur incapable de r\u00e9gler la dette qu&rsquo;il reconnaissait &#8211; affr\u00e9teur d\u00e9faillant \u00e0 l&rsquo;instance &#8211; calcul du solde du compte d&rsquo;affr\u00e8tement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 987 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; riz en sacs &#8211; fumigation au d\u00e9chargement &#8211; co\u00fbt de la d\u00e9sinsectisation et temps perdu compte affr\u00e9teur &#8211; frais de port suppl\u00e9mentaires compte armateur &#8211; vice propre de la marchandise &#8211; jugement par d\u00e9faut. Proc\u00e9dure d&rsquo;urgence. Responsabilit\u00e9 en temps et co\u00fbt de la d\u00e9sinsectisation &#8211; origine de l&rsquo;infestation d&rsquo;insectes &#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2851"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2851\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2852,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2851\/revisions\/2852"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}