{"id":2854,"date":"1998-06-22T12:21:37","date_gmt":"1998-06-22T11:21:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2854"},"modified":"2016-05-31T12:22:37","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T11:22:37","slug":"sentence-986","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1998\/06\/22\/sentence-986\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 986"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 986 – Synacomex 90 – Bl\u00e9 et orge en sacs – avaries et manquants au d\u00e9chargement – d\u00e9fendeur d\u00e9faillant – connaissements sans en-t\u00eate avec tampon de l’armateur – assureurs subrog\u00e9s dans les droits du r\u00e9ceptionnaire – opposabilit\u00e9 de la clause compromissoire – identification du transporteur maritime – r\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice (oui). <\/strong>Les assureurs subrog\u00e9s dans les droits du r\u00e9ceptionnaire ont saisi la Chambre en vue du remboursement des indemnit\u00e9s d’assurance vers\u00e9es \u00e0 leur assur\u00e9 – incorporation des termes de la c\/P dans les connaissements – comp\u00e9tence de la Chambre – transporteur maritime identifi\u00e9 par signature du Capitaine accompagn\u00e9e du tampon de l’armateur – cas except\u00e9s de la Convention de Bruxelles (non)- \u00e9tats diff\u00e9rentiels au d\u00e9chargement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 986 – Synacomex 90 – Bl\u00e9 et orge en sacs – avaries et manquants au d\u00e9chargement – d\u00e9fendeur d\u00e9faillant – connaissements sans en-t\u00eate avec tampon de l’armateur – assureurs subrog\u00e9s dans les droits du r\u00e9ceptionnaire – opposabilit\u00e9 de la clause compromissoire – identification du transporteur maritime – r\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice (oui). Les assureurs subrog\u00e9s<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2854"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2854\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2855,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2854\/revisions\/2855"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}