{"id":2869,"date":"1998-04-30T12:41:35","date_gmt":"1998-04-30T11:41:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2869"},"modified":"2016-05-31T12:42:06","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T11:42:06","slug":"sentence-981","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1998\/04\/30\/sentence-981\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 981"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 981 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; non pr\u00e9sentation du connaissement au port de d\u00e9chargement &#8211; accord sur lettre de garantie &#8211; principe de bonne foi &#8211; refus du Capitaine de d\u00e9charger &#8211; calcul du temps de planche. <\/strong>Lettre de garantie simple convenue &#8211; signature de la banque exig\u00e9e par la suite par l&rsquo;armateur &#8211; application du principe de bonne foi.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 981 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; non pr\u00e9sentation du connaissement au port de d\u00e9chargement &#8211; accord sur lettre de garantie &#8211; principe de bonne foi &#8211; refus du Capitaine de d\u00e9charger &#8211; calcul du temps de planche. Lettre de garantie simple convenue &#8211; signature de la banque exig\u00e9e par la suite par l&rsquo;armateur &#8211; application du<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2869"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2869\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2870,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2869\/revisions\/2870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}