{"id":2875,"date":"1998-04-09T12:50:45","date_gmt":"1998-04-09T11:50:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2875"},"modified":"2016-05-31T12:51:21","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T11:51:21","slug":"sentence-979","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1998\/04\/09\/sentence-979\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 979"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 979 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; avaries par mouille en fond de cale \u2013 vente DEQ (Incoterm) &#8211; assureurs subrog\u00e9s dans les droits du vendeur\/affr\u00e9teur &#8211; preuve du pr\u00e9judice (non) &#8211; int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir (non) &#8211; indemnit\u00e9 d&rsquo;assurance \u2013 irrecevabilit\u00e9. 2e degr\u00e9. <\/strong>Avarie par mouille (fuite dans un puisard) &#8211; Expertise au 1er degr\u00e9 &#8211; affr\u00e9teur\/vendeur DEQ ne font pas la preuve de leur pr\u00e9judice \u2013 d\u00e9faut d&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir &#8211; paiement d&rsquo;une indemnit\u00e9 d&rsquo;assurance ne saurait constituer un pr\u00e9judice &#8211; action irrecevable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 979 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; avaries par mouille en fond de cale \u2013 vente DEQ (Incoterm) &#8211; assureurs subrog\u00e9s dans les droits du vendeur\/affr\u00e9teur &#8211; preuve du pr\u00e9judice (non) &#8211; int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir (non) &#8211; indemnit\u00e9 d&rsquo;assurance \u2013 irrecevabilit\u00e9. 2e degr\u00e9. Avarie par mouille (fuite dans un puisard) &#8211; Expertise au<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2875","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2875","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2875"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2875\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2876,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2875\/revisions\/2876"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}