{"id":2910,"date":"1997-05-24T13:44:55","date_gmt":"1997-05-24T12:44:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2910"},"modified":"2016-05-31T13:45:28","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T12:45:28","slug":"sentence-969","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1997\/05\/24\/sentence-969\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 969"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 969 – C\/P NYPE et Synacomex 90 – fr\u00e9teur au voyage d\u00e9faillant – ma\u00efs en sacs – avaries et manquants – droit d’agir – arr\u00eat Mercandia \u2013 assureurs subrog\u00e9s – identit\u00e9 du transporteur – armateur co-fr\u00e9teur au voyage. <\/strong>Protocole d’accord entre armateur et affr\u00e9teur \u00e0 temps comportant en annexe une c\/p NYPE – navire fr\u00e9t\u00e9 au voyage selon Synacomex 90 – fr\u00e9teur au voyage d\u00e9faillant – comp\u00e9tence de la Chambre accept\u00e9e par armateur – avaries et manquants au d\u00e9chargement – droit d’agir du chargeur et de ses assureurs subrog\u00e9s – identit\u00e9 du transporteur maritime – fr\u00e9teur au voyage mandataire de l’armateur du fait du protocole d’accord – armateur co-fr\u00e9teur au voyage condamn\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 969 – C\/P NYPE et Synacomex 90 – fr\u00e9teur au voyage d\u00e9faillant – ma\u00efs en sacs – avaries et manquants – droit d’agir – arr\u00eat Mercandia \u2013 assureurs subrog\u00e9s – identit\u00e9 du transporteur – armateur co-fr\u00e9teur au voyage. Protocole d’accord entre armateur et affr\u00e9teur \u00e0 temps comportant en annexe une c\/p NYPE – navire<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2910"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2910\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2911,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2910\/revisions\/2911"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}