{"id":2913,"date":"1997-06-06T13:48:23","date_gmt":"1997-06-06T12:48:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2913"},"modified":"2016-05-31T13:49:59","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T12:49:59","slug":"sentence-968","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1997\/06\/06\/sentence-968\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 968"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 968 &#8211; Synacomex 90 &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; remise de notice sur rade &#8211; refus navire apr\u00e8s inspection des cales &#8211; pr\u00e9sence de rouille &#8211; r\u00e9siliation c\/p &#8211; extension cancelling date &#8211; surestaries &#8211; demande reconventionnelle affr\u00e9teurs &#8211; int\u00e9r\u00eat et qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 agir (non) &#8211; prescription de la demande reconventionnelle. <\/strong>Cales refus\u00e9es pour pr\u00e9sence de rouille apr\u00e8s remise de la NOR sur rade &#8211; application de la clause 8 (non) &#8211; obligation fondamentale de pr\u00e9senter un navire \u00ab\u00a0in every way fit for the voyage\u00a0\u00bb &#8211; temps comptant apr\u00e8s acceptation de la nouvelle notice &#8211; demande reconventionnelle pour remboursements de frais r\u00e9ceptionnaires suite retard du navire &#8211; int\u00e9r\u00eat et qualit\u00e9 pour agir (non)- de surcro\u00eet demande prescrite.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 968 &#8211; Synacomex 90 &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; remise de notice sur rade &#8211; refus navire apr\u00e8s inspection des cales &#8211; pr\u00e9sence de rouille &#8211; r\u00e9siliation c\/p &#8211; extension cancelling date &#8211; surestaries &#8211; demande reconventionnelle affr\u00e9teurs &#8211; int\u00e9r\u00eat et qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 agir (non) &#8211; prescription de la demande reconventionnelle. Cales refus\u00e9es pour<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2913","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2913","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2913"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2913\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2914,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2913\/revisions\/2914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2913"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2913"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2913"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}