{"id":2925,"date":"1997-04-11T14:08:20","date_gmt":"1997-04-11T13:08:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2925"},"modified":"2016-05-31T14:09:22","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T13:09:22","slug":"sentence-964","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1997\/04\/11\/sentence-964\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 964"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 964 &#8211; Gencon &#8211; absence de clause compromissoire &#8211; saisie du navire \u00e9vit\u00e9e par production lettre de garantie comportant clause compromissoire donnant comp\u00e9tence CAMP &#8211; Comp\u00e9tence des arbitres \u00e0 statuer sur la validit\u00e9 de leur investiture et pouvoir juridictionnel &#8211; irrecevabilit\u00e9 de la demande au fond. <\/strong> D\u00e9chargement de sacs de nitrate d&rsquo;ammonium d\u00e9sarrim\u00e9s, avari\u00e9s retardant op\u00e9rations &#8211; menace de saisie &#8211; garantie du P and I reconnaissant comp\u00e9tence de la Chambre pour litige n\u00e9 de l&rsquo;application de la dite garantie de paiement des sommes agr\u00e9\u00e9es ou jug\u00e9es par Tribunal commercial fran\u00e7ais, non susceptible d&rsquo;appel &#8211; demande jug\u00e9e irrecevable du fait d&rsquo;absence de clause compromissoire ou compromis d&rsquo;arbitrage.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 964 &#8211; Gencon &#8211; absence de clause compromissoire &#8211; saisie du navire \u00e9vit\u00e9e par production lettre de garantie comportant clause compromissoire donnant comp\u00e9tence CAMP &#8211; Comp\u00e9tence des arbitres \u00e0 statuer sur la validit\u00e9 de leur investiture et pouvoir juridictionnel &#8211; irrecevabilit\u00e9 de la demande au fond. D\u00e9chargement de sacs de nitrate d&rsquo;ammonium d\u00e9sarrim\u00e9s, avari\u00e9s<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2925"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2925\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2926,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2925\/revisions\/2926"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}