{"id":2943,"date":"1997-01-31T14:25:26","date_gmt":"1997-01-31T13:25:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2943"},"modified":"2016-05-31T14:26:08","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T13:26:08","slug":"sentence-958","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1997\/01\/31\/sentence-958\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 958"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 958 – Synacomex 90 – ma\u00efs en sacs – retard de paiement du fret – r\u00e9tention de la marchandise \u00e0 bord – exception \u00ab\u00a0non adimpleti contractus – immobilisation du navire – surestaries – validit\u00e9 garantie bancaire – principe de bonne foi. <\/strong>Retard de paiement du fret – exercice du privil\u00e8ge sur la marchandise – r\u00e9tention de la marchandise – exception d’inex\u00e9cution – surestaries pour immobilisation du navire (non) – frais suppl\u00e9mentaires de manutention – panne gr\u00e9ement -manquants au d\u00e9chargement – qualit\u00e9 pour agir \u2013 validit\u00e9 de la garantie bancaire contest\u00e9e par la banque \u00e9mettrice – principe de bonne foi (art.1134 Code Civil).<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 958 – Synacomex 90 – ma\u00efs en sacs – retard de paiement du fret – r\u00e9tention de la marchandise \u00e0 bord – exception \u00ab\u00a0non adimpleti contractus – immobilisation du navire – surestaries – validit\u00e9 garantie bancaire – principe de bonne foi. Retard de paiement du fret – exercice du privil\u00e8ge sur la marchandise –<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2943"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2944,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2943\/revisions\/2944"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}