{"id":2968,"date":"1996-10-15T14:52:30","date_gmt":"1996-10-15T13:52:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2968"},"modified":"2016-05-31T14:53:08","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T13:53:08","slug":"sentence-950","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1996\/10\/15\/sentence-950\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 950"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 950 – C\/P Gencon – transport d’une grue sur pneus par roulage – navire roll on roll off – ripage de la grue apr\u00e8s chargement – naufrage du navire r\u00e9put\u00e9 en perte totale – r\u00e8glement de la valeur agr\u00e9\u00e9e par les assureurs corps – colis lourd – pont\u00e9e – module de stabilit\u00e9 – manque de diligence de l’armateur – pr\u00e9paration insuffisante du chargement – devoir de concertation et coop\u00e9ration de l’affr\u00e9teur – responsabilit\u00e9 partag\u00e9e. <\/strong>Ripage d’une grue en pont\u00e9e suite \u00e0 g\u00eete soudaine du navire – naufrage et renflouement – perte totale – recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande du fait liquidation judiciaire de l’affr\u00e9teur – d\u00e9claration de cr\u00e9ance au liquidateur – arbitres ne peuvent prononcer condamnation mais constater les cr\u00e9ances \u2013 obligation de navigabilit\u00e9 \u00e0 tous \u00e9gards – clause N\u00b0 2 Gencon – manque de coop\u00e9ration de l’affr\u00e9teur – centre de gravit\u00e9 de la grue inconnue.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 950 – C\/P Gencon – transport d’une grue sur pneus par roulage – navire roll on roll off – ripage de la grue apr\u00e8s chargement – naufrage du navire r\u00e9put\u00e9 en perte totale – r\u00e8glement de la valeur agr\u00e9\u00e9e par les assureurs corps – colis lourd – pont\u00e9e – module de stabilit\u00e9 – manque<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2968","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2968","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2968"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2968\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2969,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2968\/revisions\/2969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2968"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2968"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2968"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}