{"id":2986,"date":"1996-06-05T13:14:58","date_gmt":"1996-06-05T12:14:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2986"},"modified":"2016-06-01T13:15:42","modified_gmt":"2016-06-01T12:15:42","slug":"sentence-947","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1996\/06\/05\/sentence-947\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 947"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 947 – Synacomex – riz en sacs – dommages par mouille pertes et manquants – comp\u00e9tence de la Chambre – droit d’agir fond\u00e9 sur connaissements – nullit\u00e9 clauses att\u00e9nuant la responsabilit\u00e9 du transporteur \u2013 Convention de Bruxelles – Recevabilit\u00e9 de l’action \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard de l’affr\u00e9teur \u00e0 temps sous fr\u00e9teur au voyage – calcul du pr\u00e9judice pour les dommages. <\/strong>Comp\u00e9tence de la Chambre – clause compromissoire – qualit\u00e9 juridique des d\u00e9fendeurs (armateurs et disponent owners, affr\u00e9teur \u00e0 temps et sous fr\u00e9teur au voyage).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 947 – Synacomex – riz en sacs – dommages par mouille pertes et manquants – comp\u00e9tence de la Chambre – droit d’agir fond\u00e9 sur connaissements – nullit\u00e9 clauses att\u00e9nuant la responsabilit\u00e9 du transporteur \u2013 Convention de Bruxelles – Recevabilit\u00e9 de l’action \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard de l’affr\u00e9teur \u00e0 temps sous fr\u00e9teur au voyage – calcul du<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2986","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2986"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2986\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2987,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2986\/revisions\/2987"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}