{"id":2998,"date":"1996-05-29T13:32:45","date_gmt":"1996-05-29T12:32:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2998"},"modified":"2016-06-01T13:33:22","modified_gmt":"2016-06-01T12:33:22","slug":"sentence-943","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1996\/05\/29\/sentence-943\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 943"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 943 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; manquants &#8211; preuve des manquants \u2013 absence de documents contradictoires &#8211; Conflit entre clause FIO et clause Paramount &#8211; D\u00e9fendeur d\u00e9faillant. <\/strong>Clause FIO consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme purement financi\u00e8re &#8211; fr\u00e9teur pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 responsable des manquants &#8211; Convention de Bruxelles applicable de plein droit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 943 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; bl\u00e9 en vrac &#8211; manquants &#8211; preuve des manquants \u2013 absence de documents contradictoires &#8211; Conflit entre clause FIO et clause Paramount &#8211; D\u00e9fendeur d\u00e9faillant. Clause FIO consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme purement financi\u00e8re &#8211; fr\u00e9teur pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 responsable des manquants &#8211; Convention de Bruxelles applicable de plein droit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2998","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2998"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2998\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2999,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2998\/revisions\/2999"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}