{"id":3004,"date":"1996-07-18T13:38:34","date_gmt":"1996-07-18T12:38:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3004"},"modified":"2016-06-01T13:39:10","modified_gmt":"2016-06-01T12:39:10","slug":"sentence-941","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1996\/07\/18\/sentence-941\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 941"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 941 – Synacomex 90 – bl\u00e9 en vrac – manquants – responsabilit\u00e9 des op\u00e9rations de manutention – Conflit entre clause FIO et clause Paramount – commune intention des parties – Convention de Bruxelles \u2013 application de la clause FIO – preuve des manquants – volont\u00e9 des parties. <\/strong>Clause FIO et Clause Paramount – libert\u00e9 contractuelle est la r\u00e8gle – Il n’y a pas lieu d’\u00e9carter la clause FIO express\u00e9ment pr\u00e9vue.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 941 – Synacomex 90 – bl\u00e9 en vrac – manquants – responsabilit\u00e9 des op\u00e9rations de manutention – Conflit entre clause FIO et clause Paramount – commune intention des parties – Convention de Bruxelles \u2013 application de la clause FIO – preuve des manquants – volont\u00e9 des parties. Clause FIO et Clause Paramount – libert\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3004","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3004","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3004"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3004\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3005,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3004\/revisions\/3005"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3004"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3004"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3004"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}