{"id":3008,"date":"1996-05-31T13:43:28","date_gmt":"1996-05-31T12:43:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3008"},"modified":"2016-06-01T13:44:00","modified_gmt":"2016-06-01T12:44:00","slug":"sentence-940","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1996\/05\/31\/sentence-940\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 940"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 940 – Contrat de mandat pour l’exploitation d’une barge – accord de participation aux r\u00e9sultats – d\u00e9nonciation – date d’expiration \u2013 non renouvellement – art.1162 Code Civil. <\/strong>R\u00e9sultats d\u00e9ficitaires – refus de l’agent de participer aux r\u00e9sultats au del\u00e0 de la date d’expiration litigieuse – art. 1162 Coede Civil convention doit s’interpr\u00e9ter contre celui qui a stipul\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 940 – Contrat de mandat pour l’exploitation d’une barge – accord de participation aux r\u00e9sultats – d\u00e9nonciation – date d’expiration \u2013 non renouvellement – art.1162 Code Civil. R\u00e9sultats d\u00e9ficitaires – refus de l’agent de participer aux r\u00e9sultats au del\u00e0 de la date d’expiration litigieuse – art. 1162 Coede Civil convention doit s’interpr\u00e9ter contre celui<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3008","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3008","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3008"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3008\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3009,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3008\/revisions\/3009"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}