{"id":3030,"date":"1996-01-03T14:04:18","date_gmt":"1996-01-03T13:04:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3030"},"modified":"2016-06-01T14:04:54","modified_gmt":"2016-06-01T13:04:54","slug":"sentence-933","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1996\/01\/03\/sentence-933\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 933"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 933 – C\/P Orevoy – Convention de Bruxelles 1924 – minerai de fer – voie d’eau – dommage \u00e0 la marchandise – innavigabilit\u00e9 – cas except\u00e9s all\u00e9gu\u00e9s – temp\u00eate – vice cach\u00e9 – faute nautique – demande remboursement de surestaries des navires en attente. <\/strong>Minerai de fer – voie d’eau – faiblesse de la structure – innavigabilit\u00e9 \u2013 cas except\u00e9s demande de remboursement des surestaries des navires en attente – dommage \u00e0 la marchandise – frais suppl\u00e9mentaires de manutention.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 933 – C\/P Orevoy – Convention de Bruxelles 1924 – minerai de fer – voie d’eau – dommage \u00e0 la marchandise – innavigabilit\u00e9 – cas except\u00e9s all\u00e9gu\u00e9s – temp\u00eate – vice cach\u00e9 – faute nautique – demande remboursement de surestaries des navires en attente. Minerai de fer – voie d’eau – faiblesse de la<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3030","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3030"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3030\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3031,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3030\/revisions\/3031"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3030"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}