{"id":3257,"date":"2012-12-21T14:40:59","date_gmt":"2012-12-21T13:40:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3257"},"modified":"2016-06-09T14:41:54","modified_gmt":"2016-06-09T13:41:54","slug":"award-1200","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2012\/12\/21\/award-1200\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1200"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award 1200 &#8211; C\/P Synacomex 90 \u2013 Freight payment in wrong currency \u2013 Claim for refund \u2013 N.O.R. remittance on roads \u2013 Letter of indemnity (L.O.I.) \u2013 Overage exemption certificate (O.E.C.) \u2013 WIFPON clause \u2013\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Laytime computation. <\/strong>The Charterer requested a refund after having paid freight erroneously in euros instead of US dollars. However, the Owner refused, maintaining he could offset the overpayment against demurrage allegedly due to him. The vessel gave her N.O.R. on arrival on roads as she could not go alongside because the Charterer had not yet issued an L.O.I., which was required as the bill of lading was missing. But, on the other side, the owner had not shown to port authorities the exemption certificate requested due to the vessel\u2019s age. The arbitrators decided that, according to the WIFPON clause, the vessel was entitled to remit her notice on roads and that laytime computation should continue until the L.O.I. was delivered by the Charterer. Then, laytime was to be suspended until remittance by the Owner of the O.E.C. In view of his attitude, the Owner was ordered to pay legal interest on the amount to be refunded, a sum by virtue of Article 700 of the Code of Civil Proceedings and three quarters of the arbitration expenses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award 1200 &#8211; C\/P Synacomex 90 \u2013 Freight payment in wrong currency \u2013 Claim for refund \u2013 N.O.R. remittance on roads \u2013 Letter of indemnity (L.O.I.) \u2013 Overage exemption certificate (O.E.C.) \u2013 WIFPON clause \u2013\u00a0Laytime computation. The Charterer requested a refund after having paid freight erroneously in euros instead of US dollars. However, the Owner<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3257"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3258,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3257\/revisions\/3258"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}